I am currently undergoing a ministry apprenticeship. In a nutshell, the idea is I follow around after someone in full-time ministry and get given some responsibilities and learn how to be a godly servant. However as I heard from the wise old head of MTS, Col Marshall, the great strength of MTS is also it's weakness - we reproduce ourselves. So our strengths become the strengths of those we train and our weaknesses we also pass on. Today I promised to post on new wave church-planting, so you may well be asking "what does this have to do with church planting?"While church-planting has been going on since just after Jesus ascension, the new face of church-planting worldwide is a beloved brother, Mark Driscoll. Driscoll planted his church in Seattle by knocking on doors and walking up to people till he converted enough to start a regular gathering. He is an entrepreneur. From what I can gather an entrepreneur is someone like MacGyver who armed with nothing but a toilet roll, a traffic cone and a match, could break out of a windowless prison cell. They're resourceful, is all. They're problem-solver's. They have a "can do" attitude. And apparently, if you're not, you can't plant a church. [Consequently, they do screening tests on people looking to church-plant to see if they have the right skill-set. I reckon they should just lock potential candidates in a prison cell with a toilet roll, traffic cone and a match and see what they do.] Mark Driscoll is an entrepreneur. And therefore in replicating himself he produces more entrepreneurs. But I say you don't need to be an entrepreneur to plant a church.
The new wave entrepreneurial church-planting strategy is a good one. We do need people to pioneer new ministries. Our churches would be much more effective at reaching people if all Christian's went knocking on doors and meeting people in the streets. We need entrepreneurs. But there is still hope for those who remain in the windowless cell, having snapped the match, flushed the toilet roll in frustration and sitting forlornly wearing the traffic cone on your head. You are not without hope. I will show you a still more excellent way.
Teams. That's all, church-planting teams. I want us to be more Presbyterian in our church-planting strategy. Take the focus away from the individual and onto team-planting. That is, gathering a small group from an existing gathering of Christian's, moving into a new people group or area and planting a church. The burn-out rate will be less as the workload is shared. The effectiveness should increase as there are more hands on deck. The evangelistic effort will be across a wider cross-section of the community. Best of all, the ministry will be moved away from the personality and onto the church.
Now please don't hear me bagging out on entrepreneur's going out on their own. We need them too. But I'm sick of hearing people who aren't entrepreneurial and already in their 30's say they're past it in terms of being able to plant a church. You're not.
Ideally, both methods of church-planting end up in the same place. With a committed core group of elders in conjunction with their pastors taking responsibility for oversight of the body and direction for the church, with all members proclaiming the gospel of Jesus as Lord.
In terms of church-planting, there's more than one way to skin a cat.
I guess that posting a half edited thought like this lives up to the blog's name...
ReplyDeleteYeah, and also my frozen fingers didn't move like I wanted them to. The final post is finished now. This post almost qualified as a rant.
ReplyDeleteWhat I'd like is less talk about planting and more talk about fixing.
ReplyDeleteHi Nathan, I've been waiting for an opportune time to start a long and drawn out argument with you about something seemingly insignificant, in the comments section of my blog. I've witnessed from http://nathanintownsville.com/ that picking fights with people attracts attention to your blog (at least for a short time.) [ See: http://nathanintownsville.com/disclaimer/ ]
ReplyDeleteWith that in mind, is the reason you'd prefer to talk more about fixing than church-planting, because you'd prefer to see people expend their energy within your local congregation rather than sending them out to serve the wider church? In short, are you being fundamentally selfish with people?
Wow Izaac. You're asking for it! That was a red rag with red tassles on the end... Nathan doesn't like to lose!
ReplyDeleteI'm with Nathan here. The attraction of talking about church planting is that all the talk takes place in dreamland. It's all imaginary. There are no real people with real, significant issues and hangups and gifts and life experiences to have to bring the gospel to. Much easier to theorize about the perfect church that you'll create.
Are Presbyterians really into team ministry? I can't think of too many places that have appointed an assistant to the minister in Sydney - as far as my knowledge goes there are only a couple and they had to fight to get it. So, what do you mean when you say we should be more 'presybeterian'?
ReplyDeleteHi Dave,
ReplyDeleteThe team ministry in Presbyterian churches I'm thinking of is the selection and utilisation of a core group of elders (The Session). They set the direction of the church, take responsibility for people and solve-problems in conjunction with the minister. The concept of team ministry as the paid ministers is an important one, but not necessarily of great relevance at least in the beginning to church planting as paying one minister is usually a stretch!
I made the comment in the previous post "An idiot's guide to denominational hierarchy", that the Anglicans church-plant like Presbyterian's and vice-versa. That is, as you have said, if you want to church-plant as a Presbyterian, they generally want people to go out on their own. The Anglican's I know are generally into sending out a group of people to plant a church with an employed minister (which follows the theoretical hierarchical structure of a Presbyterian church).
So we need to be more like the Anglican's (who are planting like Presbyterians) in the sense of emphasising planting teams rather than individual's.
Confused?