Wednesday, February 23, 2011

True humanity

Your mission (cue music), should you choose to accept it, is to help me solve a riddle. I've been given the task of preaching as part of my church's doctrine series, on the topic of 'Mankind'. Easy enough, I know you're thinking – we are created by God, but we are sinful, we cannot understand ourselves without knowing our creatureliness, our fallenness and Jesus as the ultimate man.

The problem is, I can't really talk about creation as that was last Sunday. I can't really talk about sin and suffering, that's the following week. I can't really talk about Jesus, we'll cover him over two weeks under 'The Person of Jesus' and 'The Work of Jesus'. So what should I do?

It is, essentially a sermon on the role of mankind from Genesis 1-2. The question is, why is it important to know the way we were created?

Now my conviction is I don't think you can understand humanity without understanding sin. I don't think you can understand humanity without understanding Jesus as true humanity. But the easy thing to do would be to say, "Well, who cares about what we're doing these other weeks, I'll just say what I need to". That, I think, would be to waste the opportunity. It is fundamental to our understanding of this world which can appear to be chaotic, and disordered, and ravaged by the effects of sin, that we do see God's good disposition to his creation and the associated value that gives us, and the role that gives us within the world.

So my three relationships which help us to understand mankind are:
1. Mankind in relationship to God
2. Mankind in relationship to each other
3. Mankind in relationship to creation

Visually it might be represented a little bit like this...
As for where I go from there, if I had to go to only one place (which with a 22 minute limit looks likely) I will probably go to Mt 28 where Jesus says all authority on heaven and earth has been given to me, therefore go and make disciples.

The line of thought being that the true reflection of our created selves is to be a follower of Jesus which enables us to relate rightly in the three relationships of points 1-3. In terms of role (our gardening) that commission is fulfilled still through the bearing of children, but the bearing of spiritual children as we make more disciples to also help with our gardening i.e. making following of Jesus.

If I had longer I would take the long view (which I'm not entirely convinced of being the best way to get to Jesus)
  • Jesus was true mankind (e.g. Heb 4:15 lived without sin, made like us in every way), which enables us to return to God (approach the throne of God with confidence (4:16))
  • We now restored to relationship with God express our true humanity, truly restored (Maybe 2 Cor 3:18 where we are transformed into his likeness with ever-increasing glory). Big idea is we take his benefit for ourselves.
  • So Jesus ultimately fulfilled his role as true man (Mt 28:18-20 - having used his rule correctly, he was given all authority in heaven and earth). Jesus was the true image of God in this world and his application was therefore go and make disciples of all nations.
  • We express living under God by being restored to him through Jesus. We express our restored relationship to each other as men and women and to wider world in the rest of creation by preaching the gospel. We garden and we fill and subdue through the true expression of humanity – making disciples of Jesus (Col 1:28 we proclaim Jesus, to present everyone mature in Christ.)
Another potentially simpler route is via Psalm 8, which examines man as the pinnacle of creation, and then the Son of Man as especially blessed.

Any advice? Is it just confusing? Is there a still more excellent way?

7 comments:

  1. I posted what I think is some good stuff from a guy named Doug Green when he guest lectured at QTC last year.

    Some links:

    Part 1
    Part 2

    Part 3

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yeah Ps 8 and on to Heb 2, with the side quote from Pascal about mankind being the glory and the garbage of the universe.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yeah I like Gordo's idea!
    Maybe something about what it means to be 'precious rebels' living post-cross pre- the return of Jesus.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Zac, I'd definitely give the stuff Nathan's posted a listen. I'm a Doug Green fan after he came out last year and he's got heaps of stuff that fills the gaps between the stuff other people are preaching on.

    Also, you've got all the stuff about the image of God and the priestly function of humanity you can do. So much good gear there.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks Gents.

    @ Gordo
    The succinct nature of that particular thread of scripture is almost certain to win out. Aiming for simple (not simplistic) doctrinal sermon.

    @ Nathan and Kutz
    Very helpful stuff (speculative at times as mentioned). Also full of the historical tidbits that QTC loves!

    Loved this:
    Our definition of true and normal humanity is skewed – we talk about our reality, normal humanity, as though our fallen selves are the norm. Perhaps Jesus’ humanity is the norm – and is in line with our created identity (ie that which we were created to be prior to the fall). Jesus is the true bearer of the divine image. The true human (in his sinlessness). It’s not super humanity but true humanity. It’s where we’ll be in our resurrected state. Sin is the aberration. We say “to err is human” but that’s really a definition of what it means to be fallen humans.

    Also reminds me of the threadless shirt "To err is human, to arr is pirate".

    ReplyDelete
  6. There's heaps to say about the nature of humanity in Genesis 1-2.
    You're right in so far as we can be inclined to project Jesus saving work into fixing areas that are actually part of our created nature.
    All of this is good.
    Humans were created as beings distinct from God, not as part of God. Our distinctness is not part of the fall.
    Human beings are relational. It was not good that the man was alone. Our need for others and relationships are not part of the fall.
    Mankind were created body and soul. Our physical existence is not part of the fall.
    Work was part of our created nature. It is not a result of the fall.
    etc.

    It's surprising how much dualistic platonic thinking along with spiritual mystic mumbo jumbo has subtly infected some Christian thinking.
    We can end up thinking that Jesus has saved us from a bunch of things that are part of our pre-fall human nature.
    Of course, as I was saying last Sunday, though, we don't get returned to this state, we're actually transformed to something better.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thanks Gary, you're right, there's lots there. I managed to touch on most of the points you mentioned. The one thing I didn't get to is the idea of our physicality, of our fleshliness. But it was after all, a doctrine overview week, so I couldn't touch on everything.

    ReplyDelete